Why Carige and Creval experience proves that ECB was right on guide lines

The recent troubles that Carige and Creval experienced in going to the market to raise new capital can be considered a confirmation of how needed and appropriate are detailed guidelines on NPL accounting and why the attempt of undermining this wise practice are senseless.

Cover BCE

This year both Carige and Creval were allowed to offload some relevant NPL portfolios from balancesheet through securitization schemes involving GACs. The presence of Governmente guarrantee (even though paid at market price) has significantly reduced the  impact on P&L and helped to smooth the consolidation process.

Nevertheless when the 2 banks have announced the project of capital increase larger than expected markets started again to question the fair evaluation of their NPL book.

Would the new ECB guidelines be already in place the higher transparency would have spared the troubles the 2 banks are experiencing these days.

Will Italian editors, politicians and bankers learn this lesson?

Yu can read my take on ECB Guidelines in this post

Stay tuned on Italian Banks and NPL Market  Join the Linkedin Group – Entering Italian NPL Market  and follow  #Liberi Di Scegliere via @blastingnews



GLG – Gerson Lehrman Group – Council Member

About Massimo Famularo

Investment Manager and Blogger Focus on Distressed Assets and Non Performing Loans Interested in Politics, Economics,
This entry was posted in Italian Banks and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s